61 — Semantic Caching (Redis/GPTCache)
Reuse validated answers for sufficiently similar requests while preserving tenant, policy, freshness, and task boundaries.
Connect agents to relevant, current, authorized knowledge. Design retrieval you can evaluate.
Reuse validated answers for sufficiently similar requests while preserving tenant, policy, freshness, and task boundaries.
Combine lexical precision with semantic recall, then fuse candidate rankings under one authorization and evaluation contract.
Restrict the searchable evidence set using trusted metadata before semantic ranking, while validating the store’s actual filtering behavior.
Retrieve precise child passages, then expand them into bounded parent context that preserves meaning, provenance, and access boundaries.
Use a stronger query-document relevance model on a bounded shortlist before expensive generation consumes the evidence.
Turn complex or underspecified questions into bounded retrieval plans while preserving the original intent and evidence requirements.
Combine entity relationships with source passages to answer connection-oriented questions that isolated similarity matches cannot resolve.
Blend semantic relevance with task-appropriate freshness while distinguishing publication time, event time, and validity.
Scale vector retrieval by separating storage, indexing, query capacity, tenancy, and ingestion while measuring recall under real constraints.
Build each model request from versioned policy, authorized evidence, task state, and a deliberate token allocation.
Allocate finite model context to the evidence and state that matter, preserving constraints and enough capacity for a complete response.
Use bounded evidence critique to decide when retrieval or revision is necessary, while avoiding self-confidence as a substitute for verification.
Retrieve evidence across languages using evaluated multilingual representations or translation paths while preserving source meaning and access scope.
Generate a hypothetical relevant passage to improve retrieval alignment, then answer only from real retrieved evidence.
Tune shared text between neighboring chunks to preserve boundary evidence without filling retrieval results with duplicates.
Index different views of the same source so queries can match its content, purpose, entities, and structure without losing source identity.
Keep retrieval synchronized with changing source systems using versioned events, idempotent processing, and measurable visibility lag.
Test and reduce position-sensitive evidence loss in long prompts through selection, ordering, local extraction, and explicit coverage checks.
Adapt the retrieval representation to domain relevance using trustworthy examples, hard negatives, and a controlled re-indexing migration.
Remove low-value prompt content under a measured quality constraint while preserving negation, identifiers, evidence, and instructions.