Inventory feed lags a sales burst.
Detect: Movement watermark predates the shelf observation beyond the store's configured freshness limit.
Recover: Hold quantity-based recommendations and request a current scan or refreshed ledger snapshot.
Reconcile shelf observations, inventory records, and delivery plans into manager-approved replenishment actions.
Explore in the architecture studioIllustrative reference architecture. Validate requirements for your organization.
Illustrative architecture: A grocery chain sees apparent stockouts despite positive store inventory. Shelf photographs, point-of-sale activity, damaged-goods records, and backroom counts disagree. Store managers need a short task list that distinguishes a shelf gap from a receiving error or a genuinely unavailable item.
Inventory snapshots can lag sales and waste adjustments. Sending every discrepancy straight to purchasing creates excess stock, while treating shelf-image recognition as certain can dispatch staff to the wrong location or product variant.
Specialists examine shelf evidence, ledger movements, inbound supply, and store task capacity. Their findings feed a deterministic inventory reconciliation and a bounded task proposal; agents do not independently alter counts or purchase stock.
The intended result is a reviewable operational decision with source evidence and explicit ownership. Track useful staff checks and inventory corrections separately from sales. Improved shelf availability is an operational hypothesis to test against comparable stores, not an outcome guaranteed by adding agents.
Identify candidate shelf gaps and attach image coordinates and product-match uncertainty.
Cannot convert an image observation into an inventory adjustment.
Compare sales, receipts, transfers, and waste events for the affected SKU.
Cannot post stock corrections or conceal negative balances.
Check delivery appointments and order-line status for missing items.
Cannot create purchase orders or change supplier commitments.
Propose a backroom check, count, or shelf refill according to staffing and store rules.
Managers approve assignments and any inventory correction.
Provide item movements with event timestamps and authoritative quantity adjustments.
Resolve shelf positions, pack sizes, substitutions, and product identifiers.
Owns staff assignments, task completion evidence, and manager approvals.
flowchart LR
N0["Store replenishment exception desk"]
N1["Shelf evidence agent"]
N2["Inventory reconciler"]
N3["Inbound supply analyst"]
N4["Store task planner"]
N5["Evidence ledger"]
N6["Human decision"]
N7["Authorized adapter"]
N0 --> N1
N0 --> N2
N2 --> N3
N1 --> N4
N3 --> N4
N4 --> N5
N5 --> N6
N6 --> N7sequenceDiagram
participant O as "Case orchestrator"
participant S as "Point-of-sale and inventory systems"
participant H as "Accountable reviewer"
O->>S: Read inventory watermark
S-->>O: Snapshot predates shelf observation
O->>H: Request current shelf and barcode check
H-->>O: Confirm SKU and physical count
O->>S: Refresh movement ledger
O->>H: Present reconciled refill taskBind the observation to store, shelf, SKU candidates, and capture time; reject ambiguous location metadata.
Read the inventory watermark and all later sales or adjustments before explaining the discrepancy.
Check backroom locations, substitute package identifiers, and scheduled inbound quantities while preserving uncertainty in product matches.
Apply store rules to propose a shelf refill, physical count, receiving investigation, or monitored wait for inbound supply.
Show supporting evidence and expected staff effort; require explicit review for count adjustments or supplier-order changes.
Record the worker's scan or count, reconcile the ledger through authorized tools, and label the original hypothesis confirmed or rejected.
Detect: Movement watermark predates the shelf observation beyond the store's configured freshness limit.
Recover: Hold quantity-based recommendations and request a current scan or refreshed ledger snapshot.
Detect: Product confidence and planogram identifier checks disagree.
Recover: Present both candidates and require a barcode scan before creating a SKU-specific task.
Measurement definitions, not promised improvements.
Reported shelf gaps confirmed by staff divided by shelf gaps investigated.
Time from valid observation to manager-ready task, excluding store execution delay.
Age of the latest reconciled movement watermark at recommendation time, reported by store.
Tasks merged or rejected as duplicate work divided by proposed tasks.
| Decision | Benefit | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Vision plus ledger evidence | Finds discrepancies invisible to either source alone. | Adds product ambiguity and image-governance work. |
| Manager task approval | Fits store accountability and staffing constraints. | Busy shifts can delay otherwise useful recommendations. |
| Store-local reconciliation | Limits cross-store data exposure and latency. | Central analytics must aggregate outcomes without losing local context. |
Managers validate pack conversions, stale inventory handling, and visually similar products using known examples.
One store group compares proposed checks with actual staff findings and verifies image minimization.
Managers enable approved assignments after duplicate-task and late-ledger-update exercises pass.