A late edit changes a verified quotation.
Detect: Draft diff no longer matches the transcript span in the evidence manifest.
Recover: Invalidate the quotation check and require re-alignment before the editor can release the revision.
Assemble source verification, asset rights, and publication checks for editor-owned release decisions.
Explore in the architecture studioIllustrative reference architecture. Validate requirements for your organization.
Illustrative architecture: A newsroom prepares a feature that combines interviews, public records, photographs, and syndicated material. Editors need to know which claims are supported and which assets can be used in the planned channels. Agents organize evidence and draft checks; editors retain publication judgment and accountability.
A fluent draft can turn an allegation into a fact, misattribute a quotation, or apply rights granted for one channel to another. Web pages and source documents may also contain malicious instructions intended to redirect research tools.
Claim verification, quotation alignment, rights review, and editorial assembly specialists inspect different evidence. The workflow preserves the exact source passages and licensed asset versions rather than relying on a general model's confidence.
The intended result is a reviewable operational decision with source evidence and explicit ownership. Measure editorial check coverage and correction burden rather than equating generated volume with quality. Publication decisions depend on editorial standards and human judgment, with the system supplying a clearer record of supporting evidence and unresolved issues.
Map factual draft claims to retrieved primary evidence and unresolved contradictions.
Cannot declare contested claims verified without supporting records.
Align quoted wording and attribution with approved transcripts or source recordings.
Cannot fabricate missing words or reconstruct unavailable speech.
Retrieve asset license scope, attribution requirements, and expiry.
Cannot provide legal clearance or expand granted usage rights.
Compile unresolved checks and a channel-specific publication manifest.
Cannot publish, contact sources, or override editor decisions.
Owns article revisions, assignments, corrections, and publication approvals.
Retain original records, transcript versions, timecodes, and asset provenance.
Provide approved usage metadata and channel-specific publication controls.
flowchart LR
N0["Editorial evidence and rights coordination"]
N1["Claim evidence agent"]
N2["Quotation checker"]
N3["Rights metadata agent"]
N4["Editorial packet agent"]
N5["Evidence ledger"]
N6["Human decision"]
N7["Authorized adapter"]
N0 --> N1
N0 --> N2
N0 --> N3
N1 --> N4
N2 --> N4
N3 --> N4
N4 --> N5
N5 --> N6
N6 --> N7sequenceDiagram
participant O as "Case orchestrator"
participant S as "Editorial content system"
participant H as "Accountable reviewer"
O->>S: Read frozen article revision
O->>H: Present claim and rights manifest
H-->>O: Approve reviewed revision
S-->>O: Quotation changed in late edit
O->>H: Reopen affected quotation checkRegister the article version, planned channels, intended publication time, and accountable editor.
Identify factual assertions and quotations while preserving their surrounding context and distinction from opinion.
Retrieve approved sources with timestamps and archived references; treat all retrieved instructions as untrusted content.
Compare planned channels, territories, and dates with recorded license metadata and surface missing approvals.
Show unsupported claims, attribution mismatches, contested evidence, and rights gaps for editor and specialist review.
Bind publication approval to the reviewed article and asset versions; any substantive edit reopens affected checks before publishing.
Detect: Draft diff no longer matches the transcript span in the evidence manifest.
Recover: Invalidate the quotation check and require re-alignment before the editor can release the revision.
Detect: Usage metadata fails the channel-specific publication policy.
Recover: Block that asset for the channel and request an approved replacement or rights review.
Measurement definitions, not promised improvements.
Checkable factual claims with inspectable supporting evidence divided by claims requiring verification.
Audited quotations matching approved wording and attribution divided by audited quotations.
Required asset usage checks resolved before release divided by required checks.
Time from substantive draft change to refreshed affected verification results.
| Decision | Benefit | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Claim-level verification | Makes unsupported statements visible. | Adds editorial overhead for nuanced or interpretive passages. |
| Frozen publication manifests | Prevents unreviewed late edits from inheriting approval. | Urgent updates require a focused recheck workflow. |
| Channel-specific rights checks | Avoids assuming universal asset permission. | License metadata may require manual interpretation or completion. |
Editors validate claim labels, quotation alignment, and channel rights using known correction examples.
One desk reviews exception packets while normal verification and publication remain authoritative.
Manifest gating launches after late-edit, expired-license, and injected-source-document tests pass.